Microsoft hobbles XP mini-notes with 1GB RAM limit

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

David Flynn18 July 2008, 6:00 AM

Redmond’s new XP mini-note licence dictates a 1GB memory limit to protect the high-profit position of Vista-powered notebooks


Bill Gates famously said that “640KB ought to be enough for anybody”, but his company has now decided 1GB is enough for XP – that is, if you’re running it on a mini-note.

As the new wave of mini-notes powered by Intel’s Atom processor starts to take off, bringing low-cost mobile computing to the mainstream, APCmag.com has learned that Microsoft is dictating that vendors limit their mini-notes to 1GB of RAM if they want to install XP.

The artificial memory ceiling is a condition of the OEM licence for Microsoft’s bespoke ‘netbook’ build of XP Home, which includes SP3, a pre-loaded copy of the Microsoft Works suite and links to Windows Live online services.

A high-level spokesperson at a mini-note vendor, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told APCmag.com “This is a licensing restriction on netbooks. It’s not a hardware limitation. This is to deliberately separate XP netbooks from Vista notebooks.”

APCmag.com has since learned that Acer has downgraded the memory specification on the Windows XP edition of its forthcoming Aspire One mini-note. A spokesperson confirmed to APCmag.com that the initial 1.5GB of RAM promised in its press release and Web site would be pared back to 1GB “due to XP restrictions”.

However, the Linux-powered model will retain its 512MB of RAM and the ability to be upgraded by Acer or a tech-savvy user to 1.5GB by dropping a 1GB chip into the mini-note’s on-board memory slot.

Buyers of Acer’s XP mini-note would obviously be able to do likewise, but the process necessitates removing the entire chassis (which can carry the subsequent risk of voiding your warranty). Unlike conventional laptops, mini-notes are not designed with end-user upgrades in mind. There’s usually no door for accessing the memory slot, and in many cases RAM is mounted directly on-board to speed up the production process and reduce costs.

It’s true that XP runs fine with 1GB of RAM, and mini-notes aren’t faced with hardware-intensive tasks such as playing DVDs or editing video. However, there’s no argument that with memory so cheap and the notebook industry starting to toggle to DD3 as part of the new Centrino 2 platform, there’s plenty of benefit – from a vendor’s competitive standpoint, as well as giving the user some extra overhead – to loading 1.5GB on deck.

Microsoft’s decision is also ironic, given that it needlessly cruels one of the last remaining outlets for the seven year-old old OS in a market where Linux already has its foot in the door. And Windows remains the OS of choice for vendors who want to give their mini-notes maximum mainstream appeal. Windows bestows an instant familiarity, as well as the ability for customers to install almost any of their current Windows program and have plenty of avenues for support should things go askew.

In an interview earlier this month with APCmag.com, speaking on the ‘Linux v Windows’ mini-note issue, Acer senior product manager Henry Lee said “The bulk of the requests and requirements we see in the marketplace are for the model with Windows rather than Linux”.




Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

TheSundayTalk (New user):

Ummm - why the Microsoft bashing (apart from the fact that it's fashionable)? Surely if vendors are putting in more than 1gb of RAM, they might as well stick Vista onto the machine, since that'll make better use of the memory anyway?

I totally agree with Microsoft on this one - not only will this help to keep the mini-note prices down to around the $500 mark (remember, the beefier the specs, the more the machine will cost), but if the vendor really wants to offer a Windows-based machine with more than 1gb of memory, then it makes sense to stick Windows Vista on the drive.

Unless, of course, people are just gonna reply with "oh, but Vista sucks - XP is awesome!", in which case I give up. :)

18 July 2008, 8:33 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Chris (User):

XP is faster than Vista. No matter what advantages Vista has this is a fact. XP uses less Hard Drive space. again fact. The idea of Vista on these cheap notebooks is stupid. As for it keeping the price down, have you seen the price of RAM?
I know that a lot of these arguments can be anwser with "Why not get linux?" But that's a different point all together.

18 July 2008, 8:54 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

TheSundayTalk (New user):

Yeah, and Windows 98 is faster than XP - and Windows 3.11 is faster than 98. :)

Hell, let's just all go back to DOS 6.22 and have REALLY fast computers! ;)

18 July 2008, 10:08 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Advanced Forumologist):

XP was usable even on lower end boxes at the time of it's release. I know, because I had a pre-release copy and an older PC.

Vista on the other hand is running like crap on my desktop, which isn't exactly a low end box. How well do you think it would run on a device that's purposely slow?

18 July 2008, 2:33 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Tin (Advanced Forumologist):

Oh look... Another MS goon trying to tell us Vista is better.
Newsflash: Vista is SLOWER on the same hardware, and RAM is so cheap now that 2GB would only boost the manufacture price of the device by about $10 (over the 1GB).

Again MS is restricting what customers want to push a product they don't want. Simple option: Get the Linux models. If 6 months down the track you still don't like the differences, grab a VLK copy of XP from somewhere and put that on (I don't condone piracy, but if the bear won't come to the market, you can't buy it).

18 July 2008, 9:44 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Aubrey (Frequent poster):

If it "makes sense", as you say, then why would vendors do otherwise? I think that fact that Microsoft feels the need to adopt (further) anti-competitive measures in their agreements with OEMs is an indicator that it really doesn't "make sense".

18 July 2008, 9:59 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Raindog (Advanced Forumologist):

Quoting TheSundayTalk:
Ummm - why the Microsoft bashing (apart from the fact that it's fashionable)?

Being right, is always fashionable.



Quoting TheSundayTalk:
Surely if vendors are putting in more than 1gb of RAM, they might as well stick Vista onto the machine, since that'll make better use of the memory anyway?

These mini-note PCs have CPU with less MIPS than an abandoned Pomeranian. Vista mini-note that's funny.


18 July 2008, 3:09 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

agami (User):

I wouldn't worry about it too much. An aspiring hacker will remove the 1GB RAM ceiling before you can say "Windows Vista is a memory hog and will only be viable for mini-notes in a couple of years".

18 July 2008, 10:20 AM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

BrownieBoy (User):

>> Yeah, and Windows 98 is faster than XP - and Windows
>> 3.11 is faster than 98. :)

Correct. But each of those OSes offered something above and beyond what its predecessor could do. E.g., Windows 95/98 added long file names and 32 bit memory addressing (of a sort) which made it better than 3.11. (They had a nicer UI too). XP was based on the NT codestream, instead of the DOS codestream of 3.11/95/98, so it was much more stable and scaleable. That's why users (and companies) were prepared to pay out for new machines so that they could get those extra benefits.

And what does Vista offer over and above XP? Eff all that anybody can discern. End users can't see where all the extra processing power and RAM required is actually going, and that's the problem. The user experience is no better than XP. In fact, plenty of anecdotal evidence points to it being worse, not helped by the draconian DRM that's embedded into Vista, at the behest of Microsoft's Hollywood friends.

I'm delighted Microsoft's doing this 1 Gig RAM restriction, by the way. It can only drive even more users into the arms of Linux. And as it's yet another blatant attempt to game the market to its advantage, there's a good chance that it will land it in (even) more hot water with the European Commission; the only body that has the balls to stand up to Microsoft these days.



18 July 2008, 12:21 PM (4 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

dwr50 (User):

I spent all day yesterday on the web doing the same things I usually do on my Vista box, using my Linux box, the exact same things. The Linux box worked 100%. The point is, Micro$ can no longer dictate to me or anyone that uses Linux. Just because a computer comes with Windoz or Crapple doesn't mean user's are stuck with it.

Acer Aspire 5315-2153, $348 Walmart Special,Mandriva Linux 2008.1 Spring Edition

18 July 2008, 11:41 PM (4 months ago)report abuse