Firefox 3 "Gran Paradiso": beta due soon

Send to a friend Print

Help more people find out about this story

Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon

Peter Sbarski22 April 2007, 9:25 AM

The browser battle is heating up again with Firefox 3 due for beta release in about two months. We've investigated the feature set and taken the Gran Paradiso alpha out for a spin.


Gran Paradiso: looks similar to Firefox 2 at this stage, but the real improvements are under the hood. Gran Paradiso: looks similar to Firefox 2 at this stage, but the real improvements are under the hood.

With the estimated release date of Q3 2007 and beta by the end of June, Firefox 3, code-named "Gran Paradiso", is beginning to generate some buzz around IT water coolers.

We've done a bit of research to let you know what this relentless browser juggernaut is going to offer once the Mozilla Q&A team signs off on it.

N.B.: Gran Paradiso Alpha 3 is available to download right now but bear in mind that it is buggy and doesn't have all planned features implemented.

The Firefox 3 requirements document - which you can read right here - describes the proposed feature set, requirements and prioritization for the development of Firefox.

Firefox features are given a priority rating from P1 (mandatory) to P4 (future). If a feature is assigned P1 it is considered to obligatory. Firefox will not ship without it. P2 indicates a highly desirable feature. The product will benefit from it greatly but it's not compulsory. P3 indicates a feature that is nice to have. Finally anything rated P4 is something intended for a future release.

Here are a few interesting tidbits from the requirements document and the official wiki site:

  • Mozilla wants to issue one major Firefox release a year (Firefox 3 in 2007, Firefox 4 in 2008, etc…) to drive adoption.
  • Windows Vista, XP, 2000 and Mac OS X 10.3.9+ (Universal Binary) compatibility are a P1 priority. Linux compatibility is a P2 priority. Windows 95, 98, Me and Mac OS X 10.2 are no longer supported. Other platforms are not mentioned.
  • Offline application support is a major feature planned for Firefox 3.
  • The Cairo vector graphics library is already implemented in the current apha release.
Cairo rendering: even its alpha form, Gran Paradiso is much faster at rendering Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) than Firefox 2.Cairo rendering: even its alpha form, Gran Paradiso is much faster at rendering Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) than Firefox 2.


Firefox 3 will ship with the following P1 features and improvements (not full list):
  • Unified add-on and plugin management system.
  • Better detection and retrieval of missing plugins.
  • Support of all possible media types on all platforms (as best as possible).
  • Simplified content handling UI.
  • Smooth upgrades while retaining branding customization.
  • ACID 2 test compatibility (Alpha 3 passes it already).
  • Ability to lock in branding (this feature is intended for distributors).
  • Addition of (backend and UI) support for offline app usage.
  • Improved error collection, reporting and usability of the crash report UI.
  • Countermeasures for Java/plugin/extension vulnerabilities.
  • Website content restrictions.
  • Support for web services as MIME type handlers.
  • Protection and safeguard against data loss.
  • Bookmarks backup/restore functionality and remote bookmarks.
  • Cairo vector graphics.
  • Integration of Vista parental controls.
  • Allowing the user to save the password after they know that the login was successful.
  • Improvement of performance of bookmarks, history usage and retrieval operations.
  • Better UI indication of encryption, identity, security and privacy context.
  • A more unified interface to improve usability and discoverability of features.
  • MSI installer support.
Firefox 3 may also ship with the following P2 features and improvements (not full list):
  • Simplified add-ons system: fewer clicks to install, conflict resolution, a visual cue to indicate when new add-ons are available.
  • Addition of a permanent restart button.
  • A revised download manager with pause/resume support, anti-virus integration and improved handling across multiple sessions.
  • Easy export of bookmarks to other applications.
  • Blacklisting of malicious websites.
  • Better integration with online support resources.
  • Improvement of the password manager by the way of enhanced autofill for multiple accounts, improved usability of the password manager list, etc…
  • OS-level secure password storage integration.
  • Saving of web pages as PDF documents.
  • Persistent text zoom across sites.
  • Improvement to the UI including improvement to dialogs and alerts, presentation of certificates, resizable search bar and many other things.

Chris Beard, Mozilla’s vice president of products, told APCmag.com that offline application support was a major feature. He said, “offline application support is an anticipated feature in Firefox 3. Firefox users will be able to access Web-based e-mail, calendars, RSS feeds and old content without being connected to the Internet.

"We're also investigating how we can structure bookmarks and navigation history to make these resources easier for users to access and manage. The long term roadmap for Firefox continues to align with our vision of an open, shared, and healthy Web.”

Regarding the projected timeframe for the release of Firefox, Chris told APCmag.com: “We're in the midst of alpha releases now, with our product plan published, and with our first beta scheduled toward the end of Q2 [before end of June].

"We typically have more than one beta release and multiple release candidates before we declare a release final. We are committed to delivering the best experience on the Web.

"Our entire release process is open and public, and we attract hundreds of thousands of people who help us test and provide feedback throughout the development process.”

Briefly: Hands-On Gran Paradiso

We submitted ourselves to Gran Paradiso Alpha 3 and had a pretty good time with it. Its interface was identical to that of the current release of Firefox but we didn’t mind -- glossy interface makeovers are for Microsoft and Apple's marketing departments, not the open-source community.

We were more impressed with the fact that it passed the Acid2 test with flying colours (see images), which means standards-based web programming should see another boost when Firefox 3 is released and reaches an adequate penetration level among users.

Firefox 2 Acid2 Test ResultFirefox 2 Acid2 Test Result



Gran Paradiso Acid2 Test ResultGran Paradiso Acid2 Test Result


Its performance, speed wise, was about as good as that of Firefox 2.0. With 5 tabs opened Gran Paradiso consumed about 48MB of RAM as opposed to Firefox 2 which consumed about 60MB.

Cairo worked well. We didn’t notice any major problems or glitches.

Gran Paradiso is shaping up nicely. We’ll continue to monitor its progress and keep you up-to-date.

What features do you want to see Firefox 3 (or, maybe, Firefox 4)? Let us know in the comments below.


Post your comment



Comments

RSS feed Email alert

Rhys Mataira:

Cant wait to trial a beta, love firefox!, something they could implement is an export button, i format occasionally and find an export button for all your tabs and bookmarks would be great!

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

berrd:

are there really any major advantages over ie7 with firefox 2,3 etc? for a general user?

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Manettas:

Good call. Maybe we need a head-to-head with IE7. I don't take the purist approach. Firefox may be the perfect standards-compliant browser, but when I was using it, I would often have to switch to IE which is far more tolerant of bad coding than Firefox. In fact, I've given up and switched to IE7now that it's got tabs. No more hassles.

29 February 2008, 8:41 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

UniverseJDJ:

Just use the IETab plugin for Firefox instead...

29 February 2008, 8:41 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Peter Sbarski:

A head-to-head between IE7, Firefox and, maybe, Safari could be interesting. This is something we'll have a look at.


29 February 2008, 8:41 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

tin:

Something that annoyed me with FF2 was the highly mangled preferences dialog. Something as simple as setting the proxy settings has become a long dive into the depths of the tabs and buttons. Sure the average user doesn't go there often, but some laptop users will need to visit that setting often.
I still use 1.5 on some of my systems simply because the preferences dialog is so mangled in 2

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Justin:

Hmmm - i'm surprised that after the FireFox experience, users would go back to IE7. Over the past year, since I've been actively promoting FF to friends and co-workers, I've noticed only 3 or 4 sites that are inoperable without IE (via a Javascript error). There are not a few sites with floating div issues, but that doesn't bother me - or the users I'm evangalising to - very much.

And for those sites where FF is broken, I usually contact them and notify them of the issue. FF now has over 10% of the market, I don't think we should have to revert to IE just because a site has been "designed" for Internet Explorer. Besides, as all developers know, if it's broken in FF but working in IE, chances are it's also broken in Opera, Safari and Konquerer.

Unfortunately with IE, we have to wait for changes to happen in the community before Microsoft will adopt. But that's the business model of the mainstream I guess.

I for one however, don't like encouraging a product by a company that portrays - at least to me - a "we know best" attitude to the user experience. For some reason, that really really bothers me about Microsoft.

That said, there are some MS products that contradict this view. Visual Studio 2005 - (C#, .NET) - is a pretty amazing piece of work (mayhap they followed Sun's example, but they've certainly improved on that framework).

So, I guess it comes down to the target audience. What do we want? I'd hope that we want the creators of probably the most used software today (browsers) to be listening, learning and - most importantly for me - pushing the envelope. I don't know about you, but FF sure does that for me.


29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Zeus:

I'd like to see Firefox provide equivalent support for .HTA file extensions for Windows and Linux.

And some visual affects which only work for IE at the moment (things like Gradient backgrounds etc).
(I think they are controlled by ActiveX... what a pitty)

Of course they're not important to functionality... but I can dream can't I?

:-P

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Wes:

Interesting to see that Linux compatibility is a P2 priority and not P1. Maybe its because it already works alright or maybe they are using the number to people who use a platform to determine priority level.

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Nic Summ:

I have been using Firefox Gran Paradisio Beta for 6 months.... What do they mean they are going to release a beta version in June? strange..


29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Peter Sbarski:

Nic, you've been using an alpha version of Gran Paradiso which is not feature complete (e.g. there is no "save to pdf" feature or "offline application support"). The beta release should have it all.


29 February 2008, 8:41 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

Niklas Andersson:

I would like to see my bookmark list as an expanding list in the menu when I right click :-) Not too much to ask for I persume

29 February 2008, 8:30 PM (9 months ago)report abuse Send to a friend reply

anonymous user Anonymous user